Quite a few people I know use frequencies at home for various health problems. Many get good results, but I wonder why this isn't part of mainstream medicine. If it really works, why don't doctors recommend or use it?
Show original
Kar nekaj mojih znancev doma uporablja frekvence za razne težave. Mnogi imajo dobre rezultate, a me zanima, zakaj to ni del uradne medicine? Če res deluje, zakaj zdravniki tega ne priporočajo ali uporabljajo?
Frequency therapy isn't really an "alternative" in the true sense of the word at all. It's high-tech medicine based on scientifically proven principles of physics and bioresonance. This isn't something new—Nikola Tesla and Royal Rife were already researching the effects of frequencies on cells and pathogens, and modern medicine already uses electromagnetic frequencies in MRI machines, TENS therapy, electroacupuncture and elsewhere.
My opinion, or rather my answer to your question:
Large pharmaceutical corporations don't invest in frequency research because it doesn't allow them to sell drugs. Medicine based on pharmaceuticals simply has no interest in developing technology that could reduce the need for chemical substances.
This technology is being developed mainly in private clinics, where they have the freedom to research and experiment without bureaucratic obstacles.
Many successful treatment methods never make it into the mainstream because they require a different approach—one that treats the body as a whole rather than as a collection of symptoms.
Today, advanced clinics around the world already use frequency devices to support the body's self-healing. This isn't "guesswork"—these are tangible results and the most successful frequencies.
My opinion? Frequency therapy isn't the future—it's already here!
Show original
Frekvenčna terapija sploh ni "alternativa" v pravem pomenu besede, ampak gre za high-tech medicino, ki temelji na znanstveno dokazanih principih fizike in bioresonance. To ni nekaj novega – že Nikola Tesla in Royal Rife sta raziskovala vpliv frekvenc na celice in patogene, sodobna medicina pa uporablja elektromagnetne frekvence že pri MRI napravah, TENS terapijah, elektroakupunkturi in še kje.
Moje mnenje oz. odgovor na tvoje vprašanje:
Velike farmacevtske korporacije ne vlagajo v raziskave frekvenc, ker s tem ne morejo prodajati zdravil. Medicina, ki temelji na farmaciji, preprosto nima interesa razvijati tehnologije, ki bi lahko zmanjšala potrebo po kemičnih substancah.
Razvoj te tehnologije poteka predvsem v zasebnih klinikah, kjer imajo svobodo raziskovanja in preizkušanja brez birokratskih ovir.
Veliko uspešnih metod zdravljenja se nikoli ne prebije v mainstream, ker zahtevajo drugačen pristop – takšen, kjer je telo obravnavano kot celota in ne kot skupek simptomov.
Danes napredne klinike po svetu že uporabljajo frekvenčne naprave za podporo telesu pri samozdravljenju. To ni "ugibanje" – to so konkretni rezultati in najuspešnejše frekvence.
Moje mnenje? Frekvenčna terapija ni prihodnost – to je že sedanjost!
Post
It's easier together
Every good question starts a new conversation.
Using your device, choosing electrodes or sharing an experience. Your contribution is welcome in the community.
